Produce regulator-ready evidence of coordinated manipulation
In short. Signal by AI Uniti produces deterministic, explainable verdicts and correlates campaigns across platforms, giving organisations regulator-ready evidence of coordinated manipulation. It supports obligations under the EU Digital Services Act and the Australian Online Safety Act.
Regulation is turning narrative risk into a compliance obligation. The EU Digital Services Act requires large platforms to assess and mitigate systemic risks, including coordinated inauthentic behaviour, and Australia’s Online Safety Act keeps expanding what reasonable steps look like. Sentiment dashboards and screenshots are not evidence.
Signal is built to be explainable. Every verdict is deterministic, derived from behavioural and temporal signals rather than opaque AI, so it can be shown to a board, an exchange or a regulator without hand-waving. It correlates the same campaign across X, Bluesky, Mastodon, YouTube and RSS, capturing operations that single-platform monitoring misses.
For general counsel and compliance, this means demonstrable detection: a clear, timestamped, exportable record of what was detected, when, and on what basis. You can show not only that something happened, but that you saw it early and can prove it. That is the difference between a chart and evidence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Signal explainable?
Yes. Verdicts are deterministic and based on behavioural signals, not a black box.
Does it help with the DSA or the Online Safety Act?
It provides evidenced detection of coordinated behaviour that supports these obligations.